2015 ORS 92.377¹
Written notice to land division applicant

(1) Within two weeks of receipt of any application for a division of land under ORS 92.010 (Definitions for ORS 92.010 to 92.192) to 92.192 (Property line adjustment), 92.205 (Policy) to 92.245 (Fees for review proceedings resulting in modification or vacation) or 92.830 (Definitions for ORS 92.830 to 92.845) to 92.845 (Relationship of subdivision in manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park to planned community statutes and series partition statutes), a local government shall send written notice to the applicant if:

(a) The application meets the requirements for an expedited land division under ORS 197.360 ("Expedited land division" defined); or

(b) The local government has insufficient information to determine whether the application meets the requirements for an expedited land division under ORS 197.360 ("Expedited land division" defined).

(2) The written notice required under subsection (1) of this section must include a description of the requirements for an expedited land division and the procedure for applying for an expedited land division. [2015 c.260 §2]

Note: 92.377 (Written notice to land division applicant) was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 92 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions

Parcel of land is subject to this law even though intersected by road. State v. Emmich, 34 Or App 945, 580 P2d 570 (1978)

Imposi­tion of greater sen­tence for viola­tion of Subdivision Control Law than those imposed for viola­tions of ORS 92.010 (Definitions for ORS 92.010 to 92.192) to 92.090 (Approval of subdivision plat names) and 92.100 (Approval of plat by city or county surveyor) to 92.160 (Notice to Real Estate Commissioner of receipt of subdivision plat) did not violate equal protec­tion. State v. Baker, 48 Or App 999, 618 P2d 997 (1980)

Seller of real prop­erty could not seek to void transac­tion as it was not within class of per­sons these pro­vi­sions seek to protect. Seal v. Polehn, 52 Or App 389, 628 P2d 746 (1981), Sup Ct review denied

Law Review Cita­tions

16 WLR 293 (1979)

§§ 92.210 to 92.390

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Status of subdivisions approved or in process of applica­tion pursuant to ORS 92.210 to 92.390 under 1973, c. 421, (1973) Vol 36, p 595

Chapter 92

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Standards county may impose for approval of private roads created in parti­tioning land, (1972) Vol 35, p 1230; effect of county zoning ordinances on approved subdivision plat, (1973) Vol 36, p 702; applica­tion of Fasano v. Bd. of County Commrs., decision, (1974) Vol 36, p 960

Law Review Cita­tions

10 WLJ 394-403 (1974)


1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 92—Subdivisions and Partitions, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors092.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2015, Chapter 92, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano092.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.