2015 ORS 92.355¹
Commissioner may request further information
  • content

(1) The Real Estate Commissioner may require the subdivider or series partitioner to furnish such additional information in a "Request for Further Information" as the commissioner determines to be necessary in the administration and enforcement of ORS 92.305 (Definitions for ORS 92.305 to 92.495) to 92.495 (Cease and desist order) including but not limited to:

(a) A statement of the terms and conditions on which it is intended to transfer or dispose of the land or interest therein, together with copies of any contract, conveyance, lease, assignment or other instrument intended to be used;

(b) Copies of all sales pamphlets and literature to be used in connection with the proposed subdivision or series partition; and

(c) Any other information that the subdivider or series partitioner may desire to present.

(2) The subdivider’s or series partitioner’s reply to the first request for further information required by the commissioner under subsection (1) of this section shall be accompanied by proof of the financial ability of the subdivider or series partitioner to complete improvements and facilities which are:

(a) Required by the appropriate state, city and county authorities; and

(b) Promised to prospective purchasers. [1974 c.1 §5; 1983 c.570 §12]

Notes of Decisions

Parcel of land is subject to this law even though intersected by road. State v. Emmich, 34 Or App 945, 580 P2d 570 (1978)

Imposi­tion of greater sen­tence for viola­tion of Subdivision Control Law than those imposed for viola­tions of ORS 92.010 (Definitions for ORS 92.010 to 92.192) to 92.090 (Approval of subdivision plat names) and 92.100 (Approval of plat by city or county surveyor) to 92.160 (Notice to Real Estate Commissioner of receipt of subdivision plat) did not violate equal protec­tion. State v. Baker, 48 Or App 999, 618 P2d 997 (1980)

Seller of real prop­erty could not seek to void transac­tion as it was not within class of per­sons these pro­vi­sions seek to protect. Seal v. Polehn, 52 Or App 389, 628 P2d 746 (1981), Sup Ct review denied

Law Review Cita­tions

16 WLR 293 (1979)

§§ 92.210 to 92.390

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Status of subdivisions approved or in process of applica­tion pursuant to ORS 92.210 to 92.390 under 1973, c. 421, (1973) Vol 36, p 595

Chapter 92

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Standards county may impose for approval of private roads created in parti­tioning land, (1972) Vol 35, p 1230; effect of county zoning ordinances on approved subdivision plat, (1973) Vol 36, p 702; applica­tion of Fasano v. Bd. of County Commrs., decision, (1974) Vol 36, p 960

Law Review Cita­tions

10 WLJ 394-403 (1974)


1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 92—Subdivisions and Partitions, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors092.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2015, Chapter 92, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano092.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.