ORS 813.410
Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test

  • hearing
  • validity of suspension
  • appeal
  • rules

(1)

If the Department of Transportation receives from a police officer a report that is in substantial compliance with ORS 813.120 (Police report to department), the department shall suspend the driving privileges of the person in this state on the 30th day after the date of arrest or, if the report indicates that the person failed a blood test, on the 60th day after receipt of the report, unless, at a hearing described under this section, the department determines that the suspension would not be valid as described in this section. A suspension of driving privileges imposed under this subsection shall be for a period of time established under ORS 813.420 (Duration of suspension for refusal or failure of test).

(2)

If the department receives from a police officer a report under ORS 813.120 (Police report to department) and the person holds commercial driving privileges and the person was driving a motor vehicle or commercial motor vehicle and refused to submit to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test) or the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle and submitted to a breath or blood test and the person’s blood, as shown by the test, had 0.04 percent or more by weight of alcohol, the department shall suspend the person’s commercial driving privileges on the 30th day after the date of arrest or, if the report indicates that the person failed a blood test, on the 60th day after receipt of the report, unless, at a hearing described under this section, the department determines that the suspension would not be valid as described in this section. A commercial driving privileges suspension imposed under this subsection shall be for a period of time established under ORS 809.510 (Conviction of crime) or 809.520 (Lifetime suspension of commercial driving privileges).

(3)

If within 10 days from the date of arrest, or, if the person fails a blood test, within 10 days from the date the department sends notice of suspension, the department receives a request for a hearing from a person whose driving privileges or commercial driving privileges the department proposes to suspend under this section, the department shall provide a hearing in accordance with this section. The person shall request a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by the department by rule. Except as otherwise provided under this section, a hearing held by the department under this section is subject to the provisions for contested cases, other than appeal provisions, under ORS chapter 183. The applicable appeal provisions are as provided under ORS 813.450 (Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test) and section 24, chapter 672, Oregon Laws 1985. Notwithstanding ORS 809.430 (Notice of suspension, cancellation or revocation), the department is not required to give any notice of intent to suspend or suspension in addition to that provided under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test).

(4)

Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, a hearing required by this section is subject to all of the following:

(a)

The hearing shall be conducted by an administrative law judge assigned from the Office of Administrative Hearings established under ORS 183.605 (Office of Administrative Hearings).

(b)

The administrative law judge shall conduct the hearing by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device.

(c)

The department may authorize the administrative law judge to issue a final order in any case.

(d)

A person who requests a hearing under this section and who fails, without just cause, to appear personally or through an attorney waives the right to a hearing. If a person waives a right to a hearing under this paragraph, the department is not required to make any showing at hearing.

(e)

Except as provided in ORS 813.440 (Grounds for hearing on validity of suspension) or upon remand under ORS 813.450 (Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test), the department shall hold the hearing and issue a final order within 30 days of the date of the arrest or, if the person fails a blood test, within 60 days from the date the department received the report of the failure.

(f)

In connection with the hearing, the department or its authorized representative may administer oaths and shall issue subpoenas for the appearance of witnesses by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device at the hearing requested by the person or the department and the production of relevant documents.

(g)

The hearing shall be recorded by whatever means may be determined by the department and shall include testimony and exhibits, if any. The record of the proceedings may not be transcribed unless requested by a party to the proceeding.

(5)

Subject to subsection (6) of this section:

(a)

A person or a police officer may request that a hearing required by this section be conducted in person.

(b)

The department, by rule, shall establish the manner and time limitation requirements by which a person or a police officer may request that a hearing be conducted in person.

(c)

Unless there is an agreement between the person and the department that the hearing be conducted elsewhere, a hearing requested under this subsection shall be held either in the county where the alleged offense occurred or at any place within 100 miles of the place where the offense is alleged to have occurred, as established by the department by rule.

(d)

In connection with the hearing, the department or its authorized representative may administer oaths and shall issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses at the hearing requested under this subsection by the person and the production of relevant documents.

(6)

The chief administrative law judge may require that a hearing required by this section be conducted by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device when the judge determines that a hearing conducted in person would pose a significant risk to health or safety, including risks associated with travel to the hearing location.

(7)

This subsection shall be narrowly construed so as to effect the legislative purpose of limiting the scope of hearings under this section. The scope of a hearing under this section shall be limited to whether the suspension is valid as described in this subsection. A suspension under this section is valid if all of the following requirements have been met:

(a)

The person, at the time the person was requested to submit to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), was under arrest for driving while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 (Driving under the influence of intoxicants) or a municipal ordinance.

(b)

The police had reasonable grounds to believe, at the time the request was made, that the person arrested had been driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 (Driving under the influence of intoxicants) or of a municipal ordinance.

(c)

The person refused a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), or took a breath or blood test and the test disclosed that the level of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time of the test was:

(A)

0.08 percent or more by weight if the person was not driving a commercial motor vehicle;

(B)

0.04 percent or more by weight if the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle; or

(C)

Any amount if the person was under 21 years of age.

(d)

If the report under ORS 813.120 (Police report to department) indicates that the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle, the vehicle was in fact a commercial motor vehicle as defined in ORS 801.208 (“Commercial motor vehicle.”).

(e)

The person had been informed under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test) of rights and consequences as described under ORS 813.130 (Rights of and consequences for person asked to take test).

(f)

The person was given written notice required under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test).

(g)

If the person arrested submitted to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), the person administering the test was qualified to administer the test under ORS 813.160 (Methods of conducting chemical analyses).

(h)

If the person arrested submitted to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), the methods, procedures and equipment used in the test complied with requirements under ORS 813.160 (Methods of conducting chemical analyses).

(8)

A suspension imposed under this section shall remain in effect pending any appeal or remand of a final order issued under this section and there shall be no stay of the suspension pending appeal or remand.

(9)

Unless a person fails, without just cause, to appear personally or through an attorney at a hearing requested under this section, a person shall have the right to appeal any final order by the department after a hearing under this section by filing a petition. The following apply to this subsection:

(a)

The person shall file the petition in the circuit court for the county where the person resides or, if the person does not reside in Oregon, in the circuit court of the county in which the arrest took place within 30 days after issuance of the final order of the department.

(b)

The court upon receipt of the petition shall set the matter for hearing upon 10 days’ notice to the department and the petitioner unless hearing is waived by both the department and the petitioner. [1983 c.338 §358; 1985 c.16 §167; 1985 c.672 §13; 1987 c.158 §170; 1989 c.636 §44; 1991 c.860 §11; 1993 c.305 §6; 1993 c.600 §1; 1995 c.568 §6; 1999 c.831 §2; 1999 c.849 §§193,194; 2003 c.75 §67; 2005 c.649 §27; 2007 c.288 §18; 2010 c.37 §1; 2013 c.237 §29; 2019 c.312 §22; 2021 c.302 §1]
Note: The amendments to 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) by section 118, chapter 630, Oregon Laws 2021, become operative January 1, 2023, and apply to conduct leading to driving privilege sanctions imposed on or after January 1, 2023. See sections 124 and 169, chapter 630, Oregon Laws 2021. The text that is operative on and after January 1, 2023, is set forth for the user’s convenience.
813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test). (1) If the Department of Transportation receives from a police officer a report that is in substantial compliance with ORS 813.120 (Police report to department), the department shall suspend the driving privileges of the person in this state on the 30th day after the date of arrest or, if the report indicates that the person failed a blood test, on the 60th day after receipt of the report, unless, at a hearing described under this section, the department determines that the suspension would not be valid as described in this section. A suspension of driving privileges imposed under this subsection shall be for a period of time established under ORS 813.420 (Duration of suspension for refusal or failure of test).

(2)

If the department receives from a police officer a report under ORS 813.120 (Police report to department) and the person holds commercial driving privileges and the person was driving a motor vehicle or commercial motor vehicle and refused to submit to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test) or the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle and submitted to a breath or blood test and the person’s blood, as shown by the test, had 0.04 percent or more by weight of alcohol, the department shall suspend the person’s commercial driving privileges on the 30th day after the date of arrest or, if the report indicates that the person failed a blood test, on the 60th day after receipt of the report, unless, at a hearing described under this section, the department determines that the suspension would not be valid as described in this section. A commercial driving privileges suspension imposed under this subsection shall be for a period of time established under ORS 809.510 (Conviction of crime) or 809.520 (Lifetime suspension of commercial driving privileges).

(3)

If the department receives from a police officer a report under ORS 813.120 (Police report to department) and the person holds commercial driving privileges and the person was driving a motor vehicle that is not a commercial motor vehicle and submitted to a breath or blood test and the person’s blood, as shown by the test, had 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol, the department shall suspend the person’s commercial driving privileges on the 30th day after the date of arrest or, if the report indicates that the person failed a blood test, on the 60th day after receipt of the report, unless, at a hearing described under this section, the department determines that the suspension would not be valid as described in this section. A commercial driving privileges suspension imposed under this subsection shall be for a period of time established under ORS 809.510 (Conviction of crime) or 809.520 (Lifetime suspension of commercial driving privileges).

(4)

If within 10 days from the date of arrest, or, if the person fails a blood test, within 10 days from the date the department sends notice of suspension, the department receives a request for a hearing from a person whose driving privileges or commercial driving privileges the department proposes to suspend under this section, the department shall provide a hearing in accordance with this section. The person shall request a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by the department by rule. Except as otherwise provided under this section, a hearing held by the department under this section is subject to the provisions for contested cases, other than appeal provisions, under ORS chapter 183. The applicable appeal provisions are as provided under ORS 813.450 (Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test) and section 24, chapter 672, Oregon Laws 1985. Notwithstanding ORS 809.430 (Notice of suspension, cancellation or revocation), the department is not required to give any notice of intent to suspend or suspension in addition to that provided under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test).

(5)

Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, a hearing required by this section is subject to all of the following:

(a)

The hearing shall be conducted by an administrative law judge assigned from the Office of Administrative Hearings established under ORS 183.605 (Office of Administrative Hearings).

(b)

The administrative law judge shall conduct the hearing by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device.

(c)

The department may authorize the administrative law judge to issue a final order in any case.

(d)

A person who requests a hearing under this section and who fails, without just cause, to appear personally or through an attorney waives the right to a hearing. If a person waives a right to a hearing under this paragraph, the department is not required to make any showing at hearing.

(e)

Except as provided in ORS 813.440 (Grounds for hearing on validity of suspension) or upon remand under ORS 813.450 (Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test), the department shall hold the hearing and issue a final order within 30 days of the date of the arrest or, if the person fails a blood test, within 60 days from the date the department received the report of the failure.

(f)

In connection with the hearing, the department or its authorized representative may administer oaths and shall issue subpoenas for the appearance of witnesses by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device at the hearing requested by the person or the department and the production of relevant documents.

(g)

The hearing shall be recorded by whatever means may be determined by the department and shall include testimony and exhibits, if any. The record of the proceedings may not be transcribed unless requested by a party to the proceeding.

(6)

Subject to subsection (7) of this section:

(a)

A person or a police officer may request that a hearing required by this section be conducted in person.

(b)

The department, by rule, shall establish the manner and time limitation requirements by which a person or a police officer may request that a hearing be conducted in person.

(c)

Unless there is an agreement between the person and the department that the hearing be conducted elsewhere, a hearing requested under this subsection shall be held either in the county where the alleged offense occurred or at any place within 100 miles of the place where the offense is alleged to have occurred, as established by the department by rule.

(d)

In connection with the hearing, the department or its authorized representative may administer oaths and shall issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses at the hearing requested under this subsection by the person and the production of relevant documents.

(7)

The chief administrative law judge may require that a hearing required by this section be conducted by telephone or other two-way electronic communication device when the judge determines that a hearing conducted in person would pose a significant risk to health or safety, including risks associated with travel to the hearing location.

(8)

This subsection shall be narrowly construed so as to effect the legislative purpose of limiting the scope of hearings under this section. The scope of a hearing under this section shall be limited to whether the suspension is valid as described in this subsection. A suspension under this section is valid if all of the following requirements have been met:

(a)

The person, at the time the person was requested to submit to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), was under arrest for driving while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 (Driving under the influence of intoxicants) or a municipal ordinance.

(b)

The police had reasonable grounds to believe, at the time the request was made, that the person arrested had been driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 (Driving under the influence of intoxicants) or of a municipal ordinance.

(c)

The person refused a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), or took a breath or blood test and the test disclosed that the level of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time of the test was:

(A)

0.08 percent or more by weight if the person was not driving a commercial motor vehicle;

(B)

0.04 percent or more by weight if the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle; or

(C)

Any amount if the person was under 21 years of age.

(d)

If the report under ORS 813.120 (Police report to department) indicates that the person was driving a commercial motor vehicle, the vehicle was in fact a commercial motor vehicle as defined in ORS 801.208 (“Commercial motor vehicle.”).

(e)

The person had been informed under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test) of rights and consequences as described under ORS 813.130 (Rights of and consequences for person asked to take test).

(f)

The person was given written notice required under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test).

(g)

If the person arrested submitted to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), the person administering the test was qualified to administer the test under ORS 813.160 (Methods of conducting chemical analyses).

(h)

If the person arrested submitted to a test under ORS 813.100 (Implied consent to breath or blood test), the methods, procedures and equipment used in the test complied with requirements under ORS 813.160 (Methods of conducting chemical analyses).

(9)

A suspension imposed under this section shall remain in effect pending any appeal or remand of a final order issued under this section and there shall be no stay of the suspension pending appeal or remand.

(10)

Unless a person fails, without just cause, to appear personally or through an attorney at a hearing requested under this section, a person shall have the right to appeal any final order by the department after a hearing under this section by filing a petition. The following apply to this subsection:

(a)

The person shall file the petition in the circuit court for the county where the person resides or, if the person does not reside in Oregon, in the circuit court of the county in which the arrest took place within 30 days after issuance of the final order of the department.

(b)

The court upon receipt of the petition shall set the matter for hearing upon 10 days’ notice to the department and the petitioner unless hearing is waived by both the department and the petitioner.
Note: Section 2, chapter 302, Oregon Laws 2021, provides:
Sec. 2. The amendments to ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) by section 1 of this 2021 Act apply to requests for in-person hearings made before, on or after the effective date of this 2021 Act [June 15, 2021]. [2021 c.302 §2]

Source: Section 813.410 — Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test; hearing; validity of suspension; appeal; rules, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors813.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Under former similar statute (ORS 482.540)

The request to consult a lawyer before taking a breathalyzer test constitutes a refusal under this statute. Lundquist v. Motor Vehicles Div., 23 Or App 507, 543 P2d 29 (1975)

Under former similar statute (ORS 482.541)

Under this section, review of suspension order was limited to whether officers had reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner was driving, rather than whether petitioner was actually driving while under influence of intoxicants. Leabo v. State ex rel Motor Vehicles Div., 46 Or App 55, 610 P2d 317 (1980), Sup Ct review denied

Existence of probable cause to arrest for violation of ORS 813.010 is not determinative under this section, so where defendant was arrested for violation of invalid municipal ordinance, factual determination as to actual grounds for arrest had to be made. Brinkley v. Motor Vehicles Div., 47 Or App 25, 613 P2d 1071 (1980)

Driver arrested for DUII has right to independent blood alcohol test regardless of whether breath test registers more or less than 0.08 percent. Wimmer v. MVD, 75 Or App 287, 706 P2d 182 (1985), Sup Ct review denied

Unreasonable delay of petitioner before responding to requests to take intoxication test amounted to refusal and Motor Vehicles Division was justified in suspending license. Luth v. Motor Vehicles Division, 87 Or App 137, 741 P2d 897 (1987)

MVD may not suspend driving privileges based on breath test result unless driver is first validly arrested. Pooler v. MVD, 88 Or App 475, 746 P2d 716 (1987), aff’d 306 Or 47, 755 P2d 701 (1988)

[Former] ORS 41.130 (res judicata, collateral estoppel) is inapplicable to procedure under this section for suspension of license as administrative hearing is not court and hearings officer in executive branch agency is not judge. State v. Ratliff, 304 Or 254, 744 P2d 247 (1987)

Under former similar statute (ORS 482.560)

This section does not require responsive pleading by Division, although court may permit a response. Fiala v. Motor Vehicles Division, 30 Or App 589, 567 P2d 603 (1977)

In general

In order for police officer to validly “possess” permit to administer blood alcohol test, officer does not have to prove actual physical possession of written document. Fleming v. MVD, 87 Or App 613, 743 P2d 764 (1987)

In implied consent hearing, validity of driver’s arrest for DUII must be considered only if driver raises issue during evidentiary part of hearing and where driver did not request consideration of validity of arrest until closing argument, license was validly suspended. Bish v. MVD, 97 Or App 648, 776 P2d 1320 (1989); Crawford v. MVD, 98 Or App 354, 779 P2d 196 (1989), Sup Ct review denied

Petitioner’s response to request to take breath test of “No, not without the advice of an attorney” constituted refusal. Schrier v. MVD, 99 Or App 209, 781 P2d 1226 (1989)

Motor Vehicles Division must consider defense, if raised, that licensee was not driving before it may suspend licensee’s license. Hilton v. MVD, 308 Or 150, 775 P2d 1378 (1989)

Respondent’s driving in early morning and twice crossing over fog line gave officer basis for reasonable suspicion that respondent was driving under influence of intoxicants. Fischer v. MVD, 101 Or App 580, 792 P2d 445 (1990)

Under this section or implied consent law, person need only know that person is under arrest, not that person is under arrest for DUII. Oviedo v. MVD, 102 Or App 110, 792 P2d 1244 (1990)

Where, when asked to take breath test, respondent said, “No, I want a blood test, not a breath test. I want an attorney,” respondent’s statement constituted refusal to take test. Ahlbin v. MVD, 113 Or App 441, 833 P2d 1291 (1992)

Unreasonable delay of petitioner before responding to requests to take intoxication test amounted to refusal. Ranger v. MVD, 122 Or App 141, 856 P2d 1050 (1993)

Request by officer that driver take breath test did not need to follow particular form. Altree v. MVD, 125 Or App 215, 865 P2d 441 (1993)

Reasonable basis for suspecting that infraction has occurred is sufficient to permit stop. State v. Matthews, 126 Or App 154, 868 P2d 14 (1994), aff’d 320 Or 398, 884 P2d 1224 (1994)

Whether test “disclosed” unlawful level of blood alcohol is determined by numeric readout of breath testing machine; therefore accuracy of machine is not in issue at license suspension hearing. Owens v. MVD, 319 Or 259, 875 P2d 463 (1994)

Evidence disputing accuracy of properly performed breath test is not admissible at hearing. Lawrie v. MVD, 134 Or App 575, 895 P2d 790 (1995)

Where evidence does not directly establish that officer believed that traffic infraction had occurred, hearings officer may not infer belief from other facts presented. Pomerenke v. MVD, 134 Or App 630, 896 P2d 1214 (1995), Sup Ct review denied

Substantial compliance of police report with ORS 813.120 is jurisdictional prerequisite to license suspension. Coulter v. DMV, 168 Or App 442, 4 P3d 89 (2000)

“Final order” means post-hearing order that imposes suspension or declares suspension invalid. Grossman v. DMV, 183 Or App 623, 54 P3d 629 (2002)

Request for new hearing does not toll time for seeking review of final order. Grossman v. DMV, 183 Or App 623, 54 P3d 629 (2002)

Petitioner claiming lack of opportunity to communicate with counsel or others has burden of proving restriction placed on ability to communicate was unreasonable. Brown v. DMV, 219 Or App 607, 185 P3d 459 (2008), Sup Ct review denied

List of prerequisites for valid suspension of license is not exclusive. Hays v. DMV, 228 Or App 689, 209 P3d 405 (2009)

Law Review Citations

In general

30 WLR 723 (1994)

813.010
Driving under the influence of intoxicants
813.011
Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants
813.012
Crime classification for purposes of rules of Oregon Criminal Justice Commission
813.017
Arraignment
813.020
Fee to be paid on conviction
813.021
Requirements for screening interview and treatment program
813.022
Proof of treatment
813.023
Alternative payment methods for screening interview or treatment program
813.025
Designation of agency to perform screening interview and treatment program
813.030
Amount of fee
813.040
Standards for determination of problem condition involving alcohol, inhalants or controlled substances
813.050
Out-of-service orders for operators of commercial motor vehicles
813.055
Civil penalty for violation of out-of-service order or notice
813.095
Offense of refusal to take a test for intoxicants
813.100
Implied consent to breath or blood test
813.110
Temporary permit upon confiscation of license
813.120
Police report to department
813.130
Rights of and consequences for person asked to take test
813.131
Implied consent to urine test
813.132
Consequences of refusing to take urine test
813.135
Implied consent to field sobriety tests
813.136
Consequence of refusal or failure to submit to field sobriety tests
813.140
Chemical test with consent
813.150
Chemical test at request of arrested person
813.160
Methods of conducting chemical analyses
813.170
Plea agreement prohibited
813.200
Notice of availability of diversion
813.210
Petition
813.215
Eligibility for diversion
813.220
Matters to be considered by court in determining to allow diversion agreement
813.222
Right of victim to be present at hearing
813.225
Petition for extension of diversion period
813.230
Diversion agreement
813.233
Exemption from completing treatment program in this state
813.235
Attendance at victim impact treatment session as condition of diversion
813.240
Amount and distribution of filing fee
813.245
Booking
813.250
Motion to dismiss charge on completion of diversion
813.252
Motion to dismiss charge when minimal fine amount remains
813.255
Termination of diversion
813.260
Designation of agencies to perform screening interviews
813.270
Intoxicated Driver Program Fund
813.300
Use of blood alcohol percentage as evidence
813.310
Refusal to take chemical test admissible as evidence
813.320
Effect of implied consent law on evidence
813.322
Department of State Police rules regarding breath tests as evidence
813.324
Use of testimony from implied consent hearing as evidence in prosecution
813.326
Felony driving while under the influence of intoxicants
813.328
Notice of intent to challenge validity of prior convictions
813.400
Suspension or revocation upon conviction
813.410
Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test
813.412
Role of police officer in implied consent hearing
813.420
Duration of suspension for refusal or failure of test
813.430
Grounds for increase in duration of suspension
813.440
Grounds for hearing on validity of suspension
813.450
Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test
813.460
Department procedures upon verification of suspension of driving privileges of wrong person
813.470
Department notation on record of person acquitted after suspension
813.520
Limitations on authority to issue hardship permit or reinstate driving privileges
813.599
Definitions
813.600
Ignition interlock program
813.602
Circumstances under which ignition interlock device required
813.603
Waiver of costs of ignition interlock device
813.604
Notice of court order
813.606
Exception for employee otherwise required to have device
813.608
Knowingly furnishing motor vehicle without ignition interlock device
813.610
Soliciting another to blow into ignition interlock device
813.612
Unlawfully blowing into ignition interlock device
813.614
Tampering with ignition interlock device
813.616
Use of certain moneys to pay for ignition interlock program
813.620
Suspension of driving privileges for failing to provide proof of device installation or for tampering with device
813.630
Notice of ignition interlock device installation and negative reports
813.635
Consequence for negative reports generated from ignition interlock device
813.640
Additional treatment following negative reports
813.645
Motion to vacate requirement to install and use ignition interlock device
813.660
Service center and manufacturer’s representative certification
813.665
Criminal background check for technicians
813.670
Complaint process
813.680
Ignition Interlock Device Management Fund
Green check means up to date. Up to date