2017 ORS 646A.582¹
Written disclosure requirements

A vendor policyholder shall make available to prospective customers of portable electronics written materials that disclose:

(1) That portable electronics insurance coverage may duplicate coverage already held by the customer, including but not limited to homeowner’s insurance or renter’s insurance;

(2) That issuance of portable electronics insurance coverage is not required for the customer to purchase or lease portable electronics;

(3) The material terms of coverage, including but not limited to:

(a) The identity of and contact information for the insurer or the supervising entity that issued the insurance policy to the vendor policyholder;

(b) The amount of any applicable deductible and how the deductible is required to be paid when a claim is made;

(c) The benefits of coverage; and

(d) Whether the covered portable electronics will be repaired or replaced with a similar make and model, with a new or reconditioned device, accessory or part, or with a device, accessory or part from other than the original manufacturer;

(4) The process and requirements for returning portable electronics, and any fees that will apply in the event the enrolled customer does not comply with the process and requirements; and

(5) That the enrolled customer may cancel the portable electronics insurance coverage at any time and that the person paying the premium shall receive a refund of the unused portion of any amount that has been paid for coverage. A reasonable administrative fee may be charged in an amount not to exceed 10 percent of the refund due. [2011 c.393 §4]

Law Review Cita­tions

52 WLR 451 (2016)

(formerly 646.315 to 646.375)

Notes of Decisions

Where purchaser fails to provide notice of condi­tion requiring repair, presump­tion does not arise that repair time exceeding 30 business days demonstrates inability of manufacturer to conform vehicle. Pavel v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., 127 Or App 16, 870 P2d 856 (1994)

Repair time exceeding 30 business days as evidence of inability to conform vehicle applies only to presently existing defect. Pavel v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., 127 Or App 16, 870 P2d 856 (1994)

Law Review Cita­tions

19 WLR 329 (1983)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 646A—Trade Regulation, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors646A.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 646A, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano646A.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.