2017 ORS 59.345¹
When offer to sell or buy is made in this state

(1) For the purpose of ORS 59.335 (Application of certain sections), an offer to sell or to buy is made in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offer:

(a) Originates from this state; or

(b) Is directed by the offeror to this state and received at the place to which it is directed (or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed offer).

(2)(a) For the purpose of ORS 59.335 (Application of certain sections), an offer to buy or to sell is accepted in this state when acceptance:

(A) Is communicated to the offeror in this state; and

(B) Has not previously been communicated to the offeror, orally or in writing, outside this state.

(b) Acceptance is communicated to the offeror in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offeree directs it to the offeror in this state reasonably believing the offeror to be in this state and it is received at the place to which it is directed (or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed acceptance).

(3) An offer to sell or to buy is not made in this state solely because:

(a) A publisher circulates or there is circulated on behalf of the publisher in this state any bona fide newspaper or other publication of general, regular, and paid circulation that is not published in this state, or that is published in this state but has had more than two-thirds of its circulation outside this state during the past 12 months; or

(b) A radio or television program originating outside this state is received in this state. [1967 c.537 §31(3),(4),(5)]

Notes of Decisions

Evidence that defendant, California resident, was engaged in mutual agency with Oregon residents to sell interests in Oregon prop­erty, was sufficient to support jury finding that offers to sell interests in land originated in Oregon. State v. Jacobs, 55 Or App 406, 637 P2d 1377 (1981), Sup Ct review denied

Chapter 59

Notes of Decisions

Public policy does not prohibit nonculpable corporate directors held liable under this chapter from seeking indemnifica­tion from per­sons actually responsible for the wrongful issuance of unregistered securities. Collins v. Fitzwa­ter, 277 Or 401, 560 P2d 1074 (1977)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Addi­tional real estate license not re­quired where security sold is interest in limited partnership to invest in real estate, (1978) Vol 38, p 1971

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 59—Securities Regulation, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors059.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 59, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano059.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.