2017 ORS 374.360¹
Access Management Dispute Review Board

(1) If the applicant or permit holder of an approach permit requests a review by an Access Management Dispute Review Board under ORS 374.355 (Dispute resolution procedures), the Department of Transportation shall appoint an Access Management Dispute Review Board by selecting members for a board consisting of any or all of following:

(a) The Director of Transportation or a designee of the director who is familiar with the location in which the disputed approach is located.

(b) A representative of the local jurisdiction in which the disputed approach is located.

(c) A traffic engineer who practices engineering in Oregon.

(d) A representative from the economic or business sector.

(2) The Access Management Dispute Review Board shall consider information presented by the parties and shall notify the applicant or permit holder and the director of its findings regarding the department’s original decision.

(3) The director shall review the Access Management Dispute Review Board’s findings and may approve, modify or reverse the department’s original decision to approve an application for an approach permit with conditions, to modify or require mitigation measures for an existing approach permit, to deny the approach permit or to remove or modify an approach.

(4) The director shall notify the applicant or permit holder in writing of the department’s determination following a review by an Access Management Dispute Review Board appointed under this section. [2011 c.330 §15]

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 374—Control of Access to Public Highways, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors374.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
2 OregonLaws.org contains the con­tents of Volume 21 of the ORS, inserted along­side the per­tin­ent statutes. See the preface to the ORS An­no­ta­tions for more information.
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.