2015 ORS 342.650¹
(Title not available: statute has been repealed or renumbered.)

[Amended by 1965 c.100 §387; 2009 c.744 §4; repealed by 2010 c.105 §3]

Note

Repealed as of July 1, 2011

Notes of Decisions

This sec­tion, if narrowly applied to prohibit only wearing of dress which has religious significance to wearer and conveys to school children teacher's religious commit­ment, represents constitu­tional exercise of legislature's obliga­tion to protect religious freedom of pupils. Cooper v. Eugene Sch. Dist. No. 4J, 301 Or 358, 723 P2d 298 (1986)

This pro­vi­sion does not violate Title VII. U.S. v. Bd. of Educ. of School D. of Philadelphia, 911 F2d 882 (3rd Cir. 1990)

Law Review Cita­tions

65 OLR 413 (1986); 75 OLR 1253 (1996)

  • Baltimore Muslim Examiner / J. Samia Mair, Jul 16, 2009
    “The title to my earlier article on Oregon’s SB 786 "Move over France: Oregon wants to ban teachers from wearing hijabs in public schools” should really read: “Move over France: Oregon wants to continue to ban teachers from wearing hijabs in public schools.” ...”

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 342—Teachers and Other School Personnel, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors342.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2015, Chapter 342, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano342.­html (2015) (last ac­cessed Jul. 16, 2016).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.