ORS 31.300
Pleading requirements for actions against design professionals


(1)

As used in this section, “design professional” means an architect, landscape architect, professional engineer or professional land surveyor registered under ORS chapter 671 or 672 or licensed to practice as an architect, landscape architect, professional engineer or professional land surveyor in another state.

(2)

A complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or third-party complaint asserting a claim against a design professional that arises out of the provision of services within the course and scope of the activities for which the person is registered or licensed may not be filed unless the claimant’s attorney certifies that the attorney has consulted a design professional with similar credentials who is qualified, available and willing to testify to admissible facts and opinions sufficient to create a question of fact as to the liability of the design professional. The certification must contain a statement that a design professional with similar credentials who is qualified to testify as to the standard of professional skill and care applicable to the alleged facts, is available and willing to testify that:

(a)

The alleged conduct of the design professional failed to meet the standard of professional skill and care ordinarily provided by other design professionals with similar credentials, experience and expertise and practicing under the same or similar circumstances; and

(b)

The alleged conduct was a cause of the claimed damages, losses or other harm.

(3)

In lieu of providing the certification described in subsection (2) of this section, the claimant’s attorney may file with the court at the time of filing a complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or third-party complaint an affidavit that states:

(a)

The applicable statute of limitations is about to expire;

(b)

The certification required under subsection (2) of this section will be filed within 30 days after filing the complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or third-party complaint or such longer time as the court may allow for good cause shown; and

(c)

The attorney has made such inquiry as is reasonable under the circumstances and has made a good faith attempt to consult with at least one registered or licensed design professional who is qualified to testify as to the standard of professional skill and care applicable to the alleged facts, as required by subsection (2) of this section.

(4)

Upon motion of the design professional, the court shall enter judgment dismissing any complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or third-party complaint against any design professional that fails to comply with the requirements of this section.

(5)

This section applies only to a complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim or third-party complaint against a design professional by any plaintiff who:

(a)

Is a design professional, contractor, subcontractor or other person providing labor, materials or services for the real property improvement that is the subject of the claim;

(b)

Is the owner, lessor, lessee, renter or occupier of the real property improvement that is the subject of the claim;

(c)

Is involved in the operation or management of the real property improvement that is the subject of the claim;

(d)

Has contracted with or otherwise employed the design professional; or

(e)

Is a person for whose benefit the design professional performed services. [2003 c.418 §1; 2015 c.610 §1]

Source: Section 31.300 — Pleading requirements for actions against design professionals, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors031.­html.

31.150
Special motion to strike
31.152
Time for filing special motion to strike
31.155
Exempt actions
31.180
Certain felonious conduct of plaintiff complete defense in tort actions
31.200
Liability of radio or television station personnel for defamation
31.205
Damages recoverable for defamation by radio, television, motion pictures, newspaper or printed periodical
31.210
When general damages allowed
31.215
Publication of correction or retraction upon demand
31.220
Effect of publication of correction or retraction prior to demand
31.225
Publisher’s defenses and privileges not affected
31.230
Wrongful use of civil proceeding
31.250
Mandatory dispute resolution for certain actions against health practitioners and health care facilities
31.260
Definitions for ORS 31.260 to 31.278
31.262
Notice of adverse health care incident
31.264
Discussion of adverse health care incident
31.266
Discussion communications
31.268
Mediation
31.270
Payment and resolution
31.272
Statute of limitations
31.274
Patient representatives
31.276
Duties of Oregon Patient Safety Commission
31.278
Use of information relating to notice of adverse health care incident
31.280
Task Force on Resolution of Adverse Health Care Incidents
31.300
Pleading requirements for actions against design professionals
31.350
Pleading requirements for actions against real estate licensees
31.360
Proof required for claim of economic damages in action arising from injury caused by dog
31.370
Presumption of absence of negligence if defendant conducts criminal records check through Department of State Police
31.550
“Advance payment” defined
31.555
Effect of advance payment
31.560
Advance payment for death or personal injury not admission of liability
31.565
Advance payment for property damage not admission of liability
31.580
Effect of collateral benefits
31.600
Contributory negligence not bar to recovery
31.605
Special questions to trier of fact
31.610
Liability of defendants several only
31.615
Setoff of damages not allowed
31.620
Doctrines of last clear chance and implied assumption of risk abolished
31.700
Right to include medical expenses paid by parent or conservator in action to recover for damages to child
31.705
Economic and noneconomic damages separately set forth in verdict
31.710
Limitation on award for noneconomic damages in claim for wrongful death
31.715
Limitation on recovery of noneconomic damages arising out of operation of motor vehicle
31.725
Pleading punitive damages
31.730
Standards for award of punitive damages
31.735
Distribution of punitive damages
31.740
When award of punitive damages against health practitioner prohibited
31.760
Evidence of nonuse of safety belt or harness to mitigate damages
31.770
Inadmissibility of calculation of future earning potential based on race or ethnicity
31.800
Right of contribution among joint tortfeasors
31.805
Basis for proportional shares of tortfeasors
31.810
Enforcement of right of contribution
31.815
Covenant not to sue
31.820
Severability
31.825
Assignment of cause of action against insurer
31.980
Action for alienation of affections abolished
31.982
Action for criminal conversation abolished
Green check means up to date. Up to date