ORS 240.560
Appeal procedure


(1)

A regular employee who is reduced, dismissed, suspended or demoted, shall have the right to appeal to the Employment Relations Board not later than 30 days after the effective date of the reduction, dismissal, suspension or demotion. The appeal must be in writing. The appeal is timely if it is received by the board or postmarked, if mailed postpaid and properly addressed, not later than 30 days after the effective date of the reduction, dismissal, suspension or demotion. The board shall hear the appeal within 30 days after the board receives the appeal, unless the parties to the hearing agree to a postponement. The board shall furnish the division of the service concerned with a copy of the appeal in advance of the hearing.

(2)

The hearing shall be conducted as provided for a contested case in ORS chapter 183.

(3)

If the board finds that the action complained of was taken by the appointing authority for any political, religious or racial reasons, or because of sex, marital status or age, the employee shall be reinstated to the position and shall not suffer any loss in pay.

(4)

In all other cases, if the board finds that the action was not taken in good faith for cause, it shall order the immediate reinstatement and the reemployment of the employee in the position without the loss of pay. In lieu of affirming the action, the board may modify the action by directing a suspension without pay for a given period, and a subsequent restoration to duty, or a demotion in classification, grade or pay. The findings and order of the board shall be certified in writing to the appointing authority and shall be forthwith put into effect by the appointing authority. [Amended by 1957 c.205 §1; 1959 c.689 §6; 1969 c.80 §78; 1971 c.734 §35; 1975 c.427 §12; 1977 c.400 §1; 1977 c.770 §6; 1993 c.778 §24; 2003 c.213 §1]

Source: Section 240.560 — Appeal procedure, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors240.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Where after long, exceptional service, petitioner only recently developed disqualifying characteristics in the area of supervision, the board properly overruled the public employer’s dismissal of him and ordered his demotion to the highest level nonsupervisory position. James v. Employment Div., 20 Or App 309, 531 P2d 710 (1975), Sup Ct review denied

The board does not have jurisdiction to hear charges of sex discrimination. Phillips v. Dept. of Rev., 23 Or App 748, 544 P2d 196 (1975)

Failure of supervising agency to instruct employee in proper appeal procedure does not waive requirement that appeal be filed directly with board within time limit. Lamb v. Cleveland, 28 Or App 343, 559 P2d 527 (1977), Sup Ct review denied

The Employment Relations Board is the tribunal before which all parties have the opportunity to present and rebut evidence relevant to a disciplinary action against a public employe, the tribunal that resolves any conflicts in the evidence, and the tribunal which draws inferences from the evidence; overruling to extent of inconsistency, Phillips v. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 7 Or App 588, 490 P2d 5 (1971), Sup Ct review denied and Thompson v. Secretary of State, 19 Or App 73, 526 P2d 621 (1974), Sup Ct review denied. Fairview Hospital and Training Center v. Stanton, 28 Or App 643, 560 P2d 667 (1977)

Where there was basis for discipline, but such basis was different from that upon which original sanctions were imposed on employe, matter would be remanded to Division for imposition of new sanctions in light of revised facts. Civil Rights Division v. Williams, 280 Or 595, 573 P2d 270 (1977)

“No reasonable employer” test, used under this section, is judicial interpretation of statutory division of responsibility between agencies and test does not construe delegative terms over which single agency has interpretive authority so as to invade agency’s province. Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251, 628 P2d 410 (1981)

“No reasonable employer” test is to be applied by ERB in its fact-finding function in essentially same manner as reasonable person test is applied in negligence cases. Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251, 628 P2d 410 (1981)

This section does not authorize the Employment Relations Board to set aside an employe dismissal for failure of a dismissing agency to comply with a personnel rule. Payne v. Dept. of Commerce, 61 Or App 165, 656 P2d 361 (1982); reconsidered, 62 Or App 433, 661 P2d 119 (1983) (former opinion adhered to.)

Where employee in unclassified service is fired, there is no statutory requirement that employee can be fired only for cause. Brady v. Gebbie, 859 F2d 1543 (9th Cir. 1988)

Attorney General Opinions

Right of a nonlawyer union business agent to represent a member before the board, (1972) Vol 35, p 1088

Law Review Citations

51 OLR 24 (1971); 55 OLR 351-354 (1976)

240.005
Short title
240.010
Purpose of chapter
240.011
Policy on public service contracts
240.012
Job sharing
240.013
Job-sharing positions
240.015
Definitions
240.055
Personnel Division
240.057
Administrator of Personnel Division
240.060
Employment Relations Board
240.065
Appointment
240.071
Compensation and expenses of members
240.075
Removal of members
240.080
Chairperson appointed by Governor
240.086
Duties of board
240.088
Review of arbitration awards after written exceptions filed
240.100
Administer oaths
240.105
Use of public facilities of state or municipalities
240.115
Action to secure compliance with chapter
240.123
Board personnel
240.131
Employment Relations Board Administrative Account
240.145
Duties of administrator
240.160
Agency personnel officers
240.165
Cost of operating Personnel Division divided among various agencies of state government
240.167
Cost of operating Employment Relations Board divided among various divisions of state government
240.170
Oregon Department of Administrative Services Operating Fund
240.185
Maximum number of state employees
240.190
Policy on comparability of value of work and compensation and classification
240.195
Categories of positions in state service
240.200
Exempt service
240.205
Unclassified service
240.210
Classified service
240.212
Management service
240.215
Classification plan
240.217
Certain reclassifications prohibited
240.227
Salary for legislator appointed to exempt, unclassified or management service
240.235
Compensation plan for classified service
240.240
Application of chapter to unclassified or management service
240.245
Application of chapter to exempt service
240.250
Rules applicable to management service
240.306
Recruitment, selection and promotion of state employees
240.307
Procedure for enforcement of ORS 240.309
240.309
Temporary appointments
240.311
Delegation of authority and responsibility by division
240.316
Trial service
240.321
Collective bargaining
240.395
Suspension of merit system in emergencies
240.400
Designation by appointing authority of staff employees to act as alternates
240.406
Right of unclassified or exempt employee to be accompanied to employer-requested interview
240.410
Removals during trial period
240.425
Regular seasonal employees
240.430
Merit ratings
240.435
State Management Credentials Program required
240.546
Payments in lieu of sick leave with pay
240.551
Working hours, holidays, leaves of absence and vacations of employees in state classified service
240.555
Suspension, reduction, demotion or dismissal
240.560
Appeal procedure
240.563
Judicial review
240.570
Classified employee filling position in unclassified, exempt or management service
240.580
Service credits for service in unclassified service
240.590
Reemployment of employee in exempt service
240.610
Mediation service fee
240.710
Certain acts unlawful
240.750
When discipline action not to be retained in personnel file
240.850
Policy on work environments
240.855
Telecommuting
240.990
Penalties
Green check means up to date. Up to date