ORS 215.445¹
Use of private property for mobile medical clinic

(1) As used in this section:

(a) “Health professional” means a person licensed or certified by the:

(A) Oregon Medical Board;

(B) Oregon Board of Dentistry; or

(C) Oregon State Board of Nursing.

(b) “Health services” means the services that a health professional is licensed or certified to provide.

(c) “Local government” has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.116 (“Local government” and “local service district” defined).

(d) “Mobile medical clinic” means a vehicle or a transportable structure that is:

(A) Designed to serve as a facility suitable for the provision of health services; and

(B) In use by a health professional to provide health services to the public.

(e) “Nonprofit” means a corporation organized under and subject to the provisions of ORS chapter 65.

(2) A local government may not prohibit a nonprofit mobile medical clinic from:

(a) Being located on private property with the permission of the owner of the private property; and

(b) Staying in one location for 180 days or less. [2015 c.142 §1]

Note: 215.445 (Use of private property for mobile medical clinic) was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 215 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Chapter 215

Notes of Decisions

Published notice is adequate if prop­erty owners can reasonably ascertain that prop­erty in which they hold interest may be affected. Clackamas County v. Emmert, 14 Or App 493, 513 P2d 532 (1973), Sup Ct review denied

Statutory scheme es­tab­lishing LCDC and granting it authority to es­tab­lish state-wide land use planning goals does not unconstitu­tionally delegate legislative power where both standards (under this chapter) and safeguards ([former] ORS 197.310) exist. Meyer v. Lord, 37 Or App 59, 586 P2d 367 (1978)

Where county had not yet adopted comprehensive plan but had zoned certain por­tions “primarily agricultural,” county had not enacted adequate interim measures to protect its agricultural land until exclusive farm use zoning was completed. Columbia County v. LCDC, 44 Or App 749, 606 P2d 1184 (1980)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Fasano v. Bd. of County Commrs., applica­tion to county governing bodies and planning com­mis­sions, (1974) Vol 36, p 960; binding effect on govern­mental agencies of the adop­tion of interim Willamette River Greenway boundaries, (1975) Vol 37, p 894

Law Review Cita­tions

36 EL 25 (2006)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 215—County Planning; Zoning; Housing Codes, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors215.­html (2019) (last ac­cessed May 16, 2020).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2019, Chapter 215, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano215.­html (2019) (last ac­cessed May 16, 2020).
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent. Currency Information