2007 ORS 475A.111¹
Appellate review of order of mitigation

(1) In any appeal from a judgment of forfeiture, review of any mitigation ordered by the trial court shall be limited to the following:

(a) Whether the findings of fact are supported by the evidence in the record.

(b) Whether the ultimate conclusion modifying or declining to modify the judgment submitted by the plaintiff was an abuse of discretion by the trial court.

(c) Whether the judgment complies with applicable constitutional limitations.

(2) An appellate court may reverse, affirm, modify or remand the provisions of a judgment of forfeiture relating to mitigation, but the appellate court may not consider arguments for mitigation of a judgment of forfeiture unless those arguments were timely raised by the motion provided for in ORS 475A.091 (Motion for mitigation). [2001 c.780 §37; 2003 c.576 §255; 2005 c.22 §352]

Chapter 475A

Notes of Decisions

Civil forfeiture pro­ceed­ing under this chapter is not sufficiently crim­i­nal in nature to bar on state or federal double jeopardy grounds later pros­e­cu­­tion for prohibited con­duct that justified forfeiture. State v. Selness/Miller, 334 Or 515, 54 P3d 1025 (2002)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 475A—Civil Forfeiture, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­475a.­html (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2007, Chapter 475A, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­475aano.­htm (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.