2007 ORS 390.910¹
Intergovernmental cooperation
  • • county representative on management advisory committee

In carrying out the provisions of ORS 390.805 (Definitions for ORS 390.805 to 390.925) to 390.925 (Enforcement), the State Parks and Recreation Department may enter into intergovernmental agreements to form committees to advise the various governmental agencies involved regarding management of the scenic waterways. Each such agreement must provide for membership on the committee of a representative of one of the governing bodies of the counties through which the scenic waterway flows. The county representative shall be chosen by the Governor from among those individuals recommended to the Governor by the county governing bodies. [1981 c.236 §2]

§§ 390.805 (Definitions for ORS 390.805 to 390.925) to 390.925 (Enforcement)

Notes of Decisions

An ease­ment is not involved in the state's right under these sec­tions to regulate use of related adjacent land, but an ease­ment is an addi­tional right which the state may acquire by purchase or gift. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)

Time factors involved are not designed to freeze land values to subsidize later acquisi­tion by the state, nor do they impose unreasonable restraints upon landowners. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)

The regulatory pro­vi­sions are separate from the pro­vi­sions giving the state the right to acquire land or interests in related adjacent land, and the state does not gain an interest in land by the adop­tion of the Act. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)

The state's power to regulate is analogous to zoning restric­tions and therefore the state does not acquire an interest for which compensa­tion must be paid. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)

Where wa­ter would otherwise flow through scenic wa­terway, pro­vi­sions of Scenic Water­ways Act requiring showing that proposed diversion was necessary to beneficial use applied to proposed diversion in city's applica­tion for permit to operate hydroelectric facility. Diack v. City of Portland, 306 Or 287, 759 P2d 1070 (1988)

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Prohibi­tion of landfills on scenic wa­ter­ways, (1971) Vol 35, p 844; authority to designate seg­ment of Snake River as a scenic wa­terway, (1972) Vol 35, p 1226; defini­tion and regula­tion of "placer mining," (1982) Vol. 42, p 213

Law Review Cita­tions

4 EL 299-303, 373-376 (1974); 19 EL 841 (1989); 21 EL 133 (1991); 29 WLR 95 (1993)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 390—State and Local Parks; Recreation Programs; Scenic Waterways; Recreation Trails, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­390.­html (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2007, Chapter 390, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­390ano.­htm (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.