ORS 34.250
Certain mandamus proceedings under Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction


(1)

The provisions of this section apply only to the exercise of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction in mandamus proceedings that challenge the actions of judges in particular cases in the circuit courts, the Oregon Tax Court or the Court of Appeals. The provisions of this section do not apply to the exercise of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction in mandamus proceedings that challenge the administrative action of a judge or court, or that challenge other action of a judge or court that is of an institutional nature. To the extent that any provision of ORS 34.105 (Definitions for ORS 34.105 to 34.240) to 34.240 (Appeal) is inconsistent with the provisions of this section, the provisions of this section govern in mandamus proceedings subject to this section.

(2)

The case title of a petition in a mandamus proceeding that is subject to this section must be the same as the case title of the proceeding in the lower court, except that the relator must be designated as “relator” in addition to the relator’s designation in the lower court, and any party who is adverse to the relator must be designated as “adverse party” in addition to that party’s designation in the lower court. The petition must not name as a party to the mandamus proceeding the lower court or the judge whose action is challenged.

(3)

The relator must serve a copy of the petition on all parties who have appeared in the lower court case and on the judge or court whose action is being challenged.

(4)

The judge or court whose action is challenged in the mandamus proceeding may seek to intervene in the mandamus proceeding if the judge or court wishes to assert an interest separate from the parties. If the Supreme Court allows the judge or court to intervene, the judge or court shall be designated as “intervenor” in the mandamus proceeding.

(5)

If the Supreme Court elects to issue an alternative writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court shall issue an order allowing the petition. The order may be issued in combination with the alternative writ of mandamus. The State Court Administrator shall mail copies of the Supreme Court’s order and alternative writ of mandamus to the relator, to the adverse party, to any intervenor, and to the judge or court whose action is challenged in the petition. Proof of service of an alternative writ need not be filed with the Supreme Court, and the judge or court to which the writ is issued need not file a return unless the alternative writ specifically requires a return.

(6)

At any time after the filing of the petition for writ of mandamus or issuance of the alternative writ of mandamus, if the judge or court whose action is being challenged performs the act sought in the petition or required by the alternative writ, the relator shall notify the Supreme Court that the judge or court has complied. The judge, the court, or any other party to the lower court case may also give notice to the Supreme Court of the compliance. On motion of any party or on its own motion, the Supreme Court may dismiss a mandamus proceeding after receiving the notice provided for in this subsection.

(7)

If the judge or court to whom the alternative writ of mandamus is directed does not perform the act required by the writ, the mandamus proceeding will proceed to briefing and oral argument as provided in the rules of the Supreme Court or as directed by the Supreme Court. An answer or other responsive pleading need not be filed by any party to the proceeding unless the alternative writ specifically requires the filing of an answer or other responsive pleading.

(8)

If the Supreme Court has determined that the relator is entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus, the court shall direct the State Court Administrator to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus. The peremptory writ of mandamus may be combined with the appellate judgment. If a combined peremptory writ of mandamus and an appellate judgment issue, the relator need not file proof of service of the writ with the court, and the judge or court to which the writ is issued need not file a return showing compliance with the writ.

(9)

The State Court Administrator shall issue an appellate judgment showing the Supreme Court’s disposition of the matter, as provided in the rules of the Supreme Court, if:

(a)

The court has issued an alternative or peremptory writ of mandamus, the mandamus proceeding is concluded and all issues in the proceeding have been decided; or

(b)

The court has not issued a writ of mandamus, but the court has awarded costs and disbursements or attorney fees in the proceeding. [1997 c.388 §2]

Source: Section 34.250 — Certain mandamus proceedings under Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors034.­html.

34.010
Former writ of certiorari as writ of review
34.020
Who may obtain review
34.030
Jurisdiction to grant writ
34.040
When allowed
34.050
Plaintiff’s undertaking
34.060
To whom directed
34.070
Stay of proceedings
34.080
Issuance and service of writ
34.090
Order for further return
34.100
Power of court on review
34.102
Review of decisions of municipal corporations
34.105
Definitions for ORS 34.105 to 34.240
34.110
When and to whom writ issued
34.120
Courts having jurisdiction
34.130
Petition for writ
34.140
Direction and service of writ
34.150
Peremptory and alternative writs
34.160
Allowance of peremptory writ in first instance
34.170
Answer or motion to dismiss by defendant
34.180
Failure to answer or move for dismissal
34.190
Other pleadings
34.200
Allowance and trial in Supreme Court
34.210
Recovery of damages
34.220
Recovery as a bar
34.230
Imposition of fine
34.240
Appeal
34.250
Certain mandamus proceedings under Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction
34.310
Purpose of writ
34.320
Courts having jurisdiction
34.330
Who may not prosecute writ
34.340
Petition
34.350
Application by district attorney
34.355
Appointment of counsel
34.360
Contents of petition when person challenges authority for confinement
34.362
Contents of petition when person challenges conditions of confinement or deprivation of rights while confined
34.365
Filing petition of prisoner without payment of filing fees
34.370
Order to show cause
34.380
Warrant in lieu of writ
34.390
Order for arrest of person having custody
34.400
Execution of warrant
34.410
Criminal offense by person having custody
34.421
Contents of writ
34.430
Defect of form
34.440
Who may serve writ
34.450
Payment of charges when service is on person other than sheriff or other officer
34.460
Manner of service
34.470
Service when officer or other person hides or refuses admittance
34.480
Proof of service
34.490
Duty to obey writ
34.500
When return must be made
34.520
Sickness of person
34.530
Requiring return and production of party by order
34.540
Contents of return
34.550
Warrant in case of refusal or neglect to obey writ
34.560
Failure of sheriff to return writ
34.570
Precept commanding bringing of prisoner
34.580
Inquiry into cause of imprisonment
34.590
Discharge when no legal cause for restraint is shown
34.600
When party to be remanded
34.610
Grounds for discharge of prisoner in custody under order or civil process
34.620
Inquiry into legality of certain judgments and process not permitted
34.630
Proceedings where commitment for criminal offense is legal, or party probably is guilty
34.640
Custody of party pending proceedings
34.650
Notice to third persons
34.660
Notice to district attorney
34.670
Replication following return
34.680
Motion to deny petition
34.690
Requiring production of person after writ issued
34.695
Conduct of hearing
34.700
Judgment
34.710
Appeal
34.712
Summary affirmation of judgment on appeal
34.720
Imprisonment after discharge
34.730
Forfeiture for refusing copy of order or process
34.740
Amendment of petition or action against public body when wrong remedy sought
34.810
Scire facias and quo warranto
Green check means up to date. Up to date