ORS 251.235
Supreme Court review of explanatory statement

  • service requirements

(1)

Any person dissatisfied with an explanatory statement for which suggestions were offered at the Secretary of State’s hearing under ORS 251.215 (Preparation and filing of explanatory statement of measure) may petition the Supreme Court seeking a different statement and stating the reasons the statement filed with the court is insufficient or unclear. If the petition is filed and served as required in subsection (2) of this section not later than the fifth day after the deadline for filing a revised statement with the Secretary of State, the court shall review the statement and certify an explanatory statement to the Secretary of State. Failure to file and serve the petition within the time prescribed in this subsection precludes Supreme Court review and certification of an explanatory statement. If the court considers the petition, the court may allow oral argument. The review by the Supreme Court shall be conducted expeditiously to ensure the orderly and timely conduct of the election at which the measure is to be submitted to the electors. The statement certified by the court shall be the explanatory statement printed in the voters’ pamphlet.

(2)

At the time a person petitions the Supreme Court under subsection (1) of this section, the person also shall serve a copy of the petition on:

(a)

The Attorney General;

(b)

The members of the explanatory statement committee, if the committee filed a statement under ORS 251.215 (Preparation and filing of explanatory statement of measure);

(c)

The chief petitioners of the state measure, if the measure was initiated or referred by petition; and

(d)

The Legislative Counsel, if the measure was referred by the Legislative Assembly or if the explanatory statement prepared by the Legislative Counsel Committee is the explanatory statement for the measure under ORS 251.225 (Preparation and filing of explanatory statement by Legislative Counsel Committee). [Formerly 254.230; 2001 c.18 §1]

Source: Section 251.235 — Supreme Court review of explanatory statement; service requirements, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors251.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Explanatory matter was insufficient and unclear and therefore modified by the court where: (1) Language therein stated some, but not all, of the funds that could be used for mass transit if the constitutional amendment passed; and (2) an explanation regarding a percentage limitation on highway funds which could be devoted to mass transit failed to point out that it was only a statutory limitation which could be changed by legislation or initiative petition at any time. Sundeleaf v. Myers, 268 Or 302, 520 P2d 438 (1974)

Petition for review of initiative explanatory statement prepared by Legislative Counsel Committee was denied where it was not filed within statutory time period, which is jurisdictional. Anderson v. Paulus, 283 Or 237, 583 P2d 534 (1978)

This section does not require Supreme Court to settle disputed meaning of ballot measure beyond assuring that proposed explanatory statement is not “insufficient.” MacAfee v. Paulus, 289 Or 651, 616 P2d 493 (1980); June v. Roberts, 310 Or 244, 797 P2d 357 (1990)

Petitioner has burden of showing beyond reasonable argument that explanatory statement is insufficient. June v. Roberts, 310 Or 244, 797 P2d 357 (1990)

Explanatory statement is insufficient and unclear when terms used in statement differ completely from phrasing of ballot title. Sollis v. Hand, 310 Or 251, 796 P2d 1188 (1990)

To be “insufficient,” misleading language within explanatory statement must remain misleading when read in context of entire explanatory statement. Novick v. Bradbury, 331 Or 14, 10 P3d 254 (2000)

251.005
Definitions
251.008
Joint production of state and county voters’ pamphlet
251.012
Size, format and distribution of voters’ pamphlet
251.014
Electronic filing system
251.016
Disposition of fee
251.022
Voters’ pamphlet for election to fill vacancy in office of United States Senator or Representative in Congress
251.026
Statements and information included in voters’ pamphlets
251.046
Content of statements and arguments
251.049
Names or titles of persons or names of organizations excluded from arguments and statements
251.055
Type of material to be excluded from pamphlet
251.065
Filing portrait and statement by or for candidate
251.067
Inclusion of portrait and statement of candidate for county, city or metropolitan service district office
251.069
Map of metropolitan service district to be printed in certain pamphlets
251.075
Portrait requirements
251.085
Format of candidate’s statement
251.087
Secretary of State review of candidate portrait and statement
251.095
Candidate space in voters’ pamphlet
251.115
Statement of statewide and less than statewide political party or assembly
251.125
Disclaimer
251.135
Withdrawal of material
251.145
Exemption from public records law
251.155
Statements and arguments inadmissible in action to enjoin publication of pamphlet
251.165
Preparing material for inclusion in state voters’ pamphlet
251.167
Secretary of State creation of list of five most commonly spoken languages
251.170
Requirements for translation of voters’ pamphlets
251.173
Translation Advisory Council
251.175
Distribution of pamphlet
251.185
Measures, estimates, statements and arguments included in voters’ pamphlet
251.195
Form for printing proposed constitutional amendment
251.205
Appointment of committee to draft explanatory statement of measure proposed by initiative or referendum
251.215
Preparation and filing of explanatory statement of measure
251.225
Preparation and filing of explanatory statement by Legislative Counsel Committee
251.230
Effect if explanatory statement not filed
251.235
Supreme Court review of explanatory statement
251.245
Committee to prepare and file argument in support of measure referred by Legislative Assembly
251.255
Filing arguments for or against measure
251.260
Secretary of State review of arguments for error in identification of measure number or designation of support or opposition to measure
251.265
Inclusion of author of argument, author’s organization and notice of support or opposition to measure in voters’ pamphlet
251.285
Inclusion of community college district measure relating to bonding, county measure or metropolitan service district measure in voters’ pamphlet
251.295
Radio and television broadcasts to supplement pamphlet
251.305
County voters’ pamphlet
251.315
Information required to be included in voters’ pamphlet
251.325
Schedule and procedures for producing and distributing pamphlet
251.335
Filing portrait and statement by or for candidate
251.345
Explanatory statement
251.355
Filing arguments for or against measure
251.365
Cost of pamphlet preparation
251.375
Exception to ORS 251.365 for certain districts
251.385
“Electoral district” defined for ORS 251.345 to 251.375
251.395
Content of statements and arguments
251.405
Names or titles of persons or names of organizations excluded from arguments and statements
251.415
Type of material to be excluded from pamphlet
251.425
Format of candidate’s statement
251.430
Exemption from public records law
251.435
Statements and arguments inadmissible in action to enjoin publication of pamphlet
Green check means up to date. Up to date