2007 ORS 133.005¹
Definitions for ORS 131.655, 133.005 to 133.381 and 133.410 to 133.450

As used in ORS 131.655 (Detention and interrogation of persons suspected of theft committed in a store or unlawful operation of audiovisual device in a motion picture theater) and 133.005 (Definitions for ORS 131.655, 133.005 to 133.381 and 133.410 to 133.450) to 133.381 (Procedure in arrests for violation of certain restraining orders) and 133.410 (Short title) to 133.450 (After arrest), unless the context requires otherwise:

(1) "Arrest" means to place a person under actual or constructive restraint or to take a person into custody for the purpose of charging that person with an offense. A "stop" as authorized under ORS 131.605 (Definitions for ORS 131.605 to 131.625) to 131.625 (Frisk of stopped persons) is not an arrest.

(2) "Federal officer" means a special agent or law enforcement officer employed by a federal agency and who is empowered to effect an arrest with or without a warrant for violations of the United States Code and who is authorized to carry firearms in the performance of duty.

(3) "Peace officer" means a member of the Oregon State Police or a sheriff, constable, marshal, municipal police officer, investigator of a district attorney’s office if the investigator is or has been certified as a peace officer in this or any other state, or an investigator of the Criminal Justice Division of the Department of Justice of the State of Oregon. [1973 c.836 §62; 1979 c.656 §1; 1981 c.808 §1; 1991 c.67 §25; 1993 c.254 §1; 1995 c.651 §6]

See also annota­tions under ORS 133.210 and 133.250 in permanent edi­tion.

Notes of Decisions

Nonviolent flight from at­tempted arrest is not crim­i­nal, and thus evidence was insufficient to sustain escape charge where defendant was convicted of driving under influence of intoxicants and third de­gree escape. State v. Swanson, 34 Or App 59, 578 P2d 411 (1978)

Where defendant entered house in process of being searched, of­fi­cers took defendant to kitchen, advised him of rights, "patted him down," and took his money and car keys from his pockets, defendant was "arrested" as defined in this sec­tion. State v. Groda, 285 Or 321, 591 P2d 1354 (1979)

Once defendant was taken out of car and frisked, any concern about immediate danger to police of­fi­cers dissipated, and defendant was arrested within meaning of this sec­tion when he was sub­se­quently handcuffed and placed in patrol car. State v. Morgan, 106 Or App 138, 806 P2d 713 (1991), Sup Ct review denied; State v. Koester, 117 Or App 139, 843 P2d 968 (1992), Sup Ct review denied

Where of­fi­cer failed to follow pro­ce­dure for frisking stopped per­son and there was no reason to believe doing so would be futile, use of handcuffs constituted arrest rather than precau­tion for of­fi­cer safety. State v. Johnson, 120 Or App 151, 851 P2d 1160 (1993), Sup Ct review denied

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Authority of Oregon Liquor Control Commission to arrest or issue cita­tion, (1974) Vol 36, p 1066

Law Review Cita­tions

10 WLJ 30 (1973)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 133—Arrest and Related Procedures; Search and Seizure; Extradition, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­133.­html (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2007, Chapter 133, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­133ano.­htm (2007) (last ac­cessed Feb. 12, 2009).
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.