2017 ORS 18.112¹
Correction of designation of judgment as general judgment

(1) Upon motion of any party, the court may enter a corrected judgment under ORS 18.107 (Corrections to civil judgments) that changes the designation of a judgment from a general judgment to a limited judgment if the moving party establishes that:

(a) Except by operation of ORS 18.082 (Effect of entry of judgment) (3), the judgment does not decide all requests for relief in the action other than requests for relief previously decided by a limited judgment or requests for relief that could be decided by a supplemental judgment; and

(b) The judgment was inadvertently designated as a general judgment under circumstances that indicate that the moving party did not reasonably understand that the requests for relief that were not expressly decided by the judgment would be dismissed.

(2) A motion under subsection (1) of this section must be filed within the time provided by ORCP 71 B.

(3) Upon motion of any party, the court shall enter a corrected judgment under ORS 18.107 (Corrections to civil judgments) that changes to a limited judgment any document that has the effect of a general judgment under the provisions of ORS 18.082 (Effect of entry of judgment) (6) unless all requests for relief in the action are decided by the terms of the document, by previous limited judgments entered in the action or by written decisions of the court that are incorporated in a general judgment under the provisions of ORS 18.082 (Effect of entry of judgment) (2).

(4) Notwithstanding ORS 18.107 (Corrections to civil judgments), the time for appeal of the judgment corrected under this section commences from the entry of the corrected judgment. A motion may be filed under this section while an appeal is pending as provided in ORCP 71 B(2).

(5) This section does not apply to justice courts, municipal courts or county courts performing judicial functions. [2003 c.576 §13; 2005 c.568 §18]

Chapter 18

Notes of Decisions

If terms used by trial court suffice to convey court’s concluding decision or decisions, and if terms are set forth in docu­ment properly titled as judg­ment, then judg­ment docu­ment contains judg­ment. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springfield Corp., 347 Or 144, 218 P3d 113 (2009)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 18—Judgments, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors018.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 18, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano018.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.