Effect of judgment
(1) Notwithstanding ORS 131.505 (Definitions for ORS 131.505 to 131.525) to 131.535 (Proceedings not constituting acquittal), if a person commits both a crime and a violation as part of the same criminal episode, the prosecution for one offense shall not bar the subsequent prosecution for the other. However, evidence of the first conviction shall not be admissible in any subsequent prosecution for the other offense.
(2) Notwithstanding ORS 43.130 (Judicial orders that are conclusive) and 43.160 (What determined by former judgment), a plea, finding or judgment in a violation proceeding, or the fact that a violation proceeding has been brought against a defendant, may not be used for the purpose of res judicata or collateral estoppel, or be admitted as evidence in any civil proceeding. [1999 c.1051 §27; 2011 c.597 §29]
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.