ORS 138.230¹
(Title not available: statute has been repealed or renumbered.)

[Repealed by 2017 c.529 §26]


Repealed as of January 1, 2018

Notes of Decisions

The court may exercise its power under this sec­tion to affirm, notwithstanding the error, if the error was either so technical in nature or so unsubstantial that as a practical matter there was little, if any, likelihood that the erroneous evidence affected the verdict. State v. Van Hooser, 11 Or App 146, 501 P2d 78 (1972), aff’d 266 Or 19, 511 P2d 359 (1973)

Defendant’s admission of a matter as to which prejudicial error violating the privilege against self-incrimina­tion had occurred cured this error. State v. Hunt, 15 Or App 76, 514 P2d 1363 (1973), Sup Ct review denied

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 138—Conviction Relief, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors138.­html (2019) (last ac­cessed May 16, 2020).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2019, Chapter 138, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano138.­html (2019) (last ac­cessed May 16, 2020).
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent. Currency Information