2017 ORS 135.750¹
Where there is reason for delay

If the defendant is not proceeded against as provided in ORS 135.745 (Delay in finding an indictment or filing an information), and sufficient reason therefor is shown, the court may order the action to be continued and in the meantime may release the defendant from custody as provided in ORS 135.230 (Definitions for ORS 135.230 to 135.290) to 135.290 (Punishment by contempt of court), for the appearance of the defendant to answer the charge or action. [Formerly 134.130; 2013 c.431 §2]

See also annota­tions under ORS 134.130 in permanent edi­tion.

Notes of Decisions

“Sufficient reason therefor” refers to court’s decision not to dismiss indict­ment, not to state’s failure to proceed against or try defendant. State v. Johnson, 339 Or 69, 116 P3d 879 (2005)

Law Review Cita­tions

44 WLR 761 (2008)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 135—Arraignment and Pretrial Provisions, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors135.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 135, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano135.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.