2017 ORS 133.813¹
Proceedings in absence of arrest under executive warrant within specified time

If the accused is not arrested under warrant of the Governor by the expiration of the time specified in the warrant, security release or release agreement, the judge or magistrate may discharge the accused or may recommit the accused to a further day, or may again set a security release or a release agreement for the appearance and surrender of the accused, as provided in ORS 133.809 (Release); and at the expiration of the second period of commitment, or if the accused has been released and appeared according to the terms of the security release or release agreement of the accused, the judge or magistrate either may discharge the accused or may require the accused to enter into a new security release or release agreement to appear and surrender at another day. [Formerly 147.170]

See also annota­tions under ORS chapter 147 in permanent edi­tion.

Notes of Decisions

This Act was adopted to facilitate the interjurisdic­tional transfer of prisoners. Bishop v. Cupp, 7 Or App 349, 490 P2d 524 (1971)

Interjurisdic­tional transfers to clear up charges protect the prisoner’s constitu­tional right to a speedy trial and the state’s interest in the orderly ad­min­is­tra­­tion of justice. Bishop v. Cupp, 7 Or App 349, 490 P2d 524 (1971)

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 133—Arrest and Related Procedures; Search and Seizure; Extradition, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors133.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 133, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano133.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.