2017 ORS 105.152¹
Form of notice of restitution for judgment entered under ORS 105.146

If the court entered a judgment pursuant to ORS 105.146 (Failure of defendant to perform as ordered), a notice of restitution issued by the clerk of the court pursuant to ORS 105.151 (Enforcement of judgment of restitution) must be in substantially the following form:

______________________________________________________________________________

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR

THE COUNTY OF _________

Notice of Restitution

because of not complying

with a court-approved agreement

Case Number ______

TO: _____________________

___________________________

You and your landlord made a court-approved agreement allowing you to stay in the property. Your landlord claims that you have not kept that agreement. (A copy of the landlord’s claim is attached.) Unless you can prove to the court why you should not have to move out, you must move by the MOVE OUT DATE listed below. If you do not, the landlord can have the Sheriff physically remove you.

If you believe that you have kept the agreement or that you have a legal reason for not keeping the agreement, you are entitled to a court hearing. Legal reasons are listed in ORS 105.148 (Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance) and 105.149 (Hearing on compliance with order). They include the landlord interfering with your effort to keep the agreement and your complying with a modification of the agreement made by you and your landlord.

To request a hearing, you must go to the court and complete a form explaining why you believe that you have kept (or should not be required to keep) the agreement. You have to do this before _____ a.m./p.m. on_________. The Sheriff will not physically remove you from the property before the hearing.

If the judge rules against you at the hearing, the landlord can have the Sheriff physically remove you.

DEADLINE TO MOVE OUT

MOVE OUT DATE: _________

If you do not request a hearing, you must move out of the property no later than 11:59 p.m. on the Move Out Date.

If you and everyone else living there do not move out by that time, the Sheriff will physically remove you. You must also move all of your belongings by that time. Anything you leave behind will be stored or disposed of as allowed by law.

__________________

Deputy Court Administrator

______________________________________________________________________________ [2001 c.596 §15 (105.151 (Enforcement of judgment of restitution), 105.152 (Form of notice of restitution for judgment entered under ORS 105.146), 105.153 (Form of notice of restitution for judgment not entered under ORS 105.146), 105.156 (Form of writ of execution for judgment of restitution), 105.157 (Form of eviction trespass notice), 105.158 (Service of notice of restitution), 105.159 (Computation of time before plaintiff may request writ of execution) and 105.161 (Service and enforcement of writ of execution and eviction trespass notice) enacted in lieu of 105.154); 2003 c.378 §27]

§§ 105.125 to 105.160

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Condi­tions under which an attorney may appear, (1976) Vol 38, p 184

Law Review Cita­tions

16 WLR 271 (1979)

§§ 105.105 (Entry to be lawful and peaceable only) to 105.165 (Alternative method of removing, storing and disposing of tenant’s personal property)

Notes of Decisions

Provisions for early trial, posting of security for accruing rent during continuance and restric­tion of triable issues do not violate Due Process or Equal Protec­tion clauses of federal constitu­tion. Lindsey v. Normet, 405 US 56, 92 S Ct 862, 31 L Ed 36 (1972)

Proceedings under the Oregon forcible entry and detainer law, including pro­ceed­ings against nonresident defendants, are not subject to the general statutes relating to service of process. Lexton-Ancira, Inc. v. Kay, 269 Or 1, 522 P2d 875 (1974)

A forcible entry and detainer pro­ceed­ing is a “local ac­tion” for choice of law purposes. Fry v. D.H. Overmyer Co., 269 Or 281, 525 P2d 140 (1974)

the Defendant Did not State Good Affirmative Defenses By Alleging

a viola­tion of public policy forbidding a franchisor to refuse to renew a franchise except for good cause; A “retaliatory evic­tion” for a refusal to engage in improper business practices; and an implied agree­ment to renew based upon con­duct and prior dealings. William C. Cornitius, Inc., v. Wheeler, 276 Or 747, 556 P2d 666 (1976)

In forcible entry and detainer ac­tion to recover pos­ses­sion of commercial prop­erty, claim for attorney fees could not be litigated. Grove v. The Hindquarter Corp., 45 Or App 781, 609 P2d 840 (1980)

In forcible entry and detainer ac­tion for pos­ses­sion of commercial premises, landlords could not recover attorney fees. Owen J. Jones & Son, Inc. v. Gospodinovic, 46 Or App 101, 610 P2d 1238 (1980)

Equitable de­fense may be raised in FED pro­ceed­ing. Rose v. Webster, 51 Or App 293, 625 P2d 1329 (1981)

In FED ac­tion to recover commercial prop­erty, defendant cannot assert counterclaim unless counterclaim is authorized by statute. Class v. Carter, 293 Or 147, 645 P2d 536 (1982)

Law Review Cita­tions

16 WLR 291 (1979)

Chapter 105

Atty. Gen. Opinions

Private process server in a forcible entry and detainer ac­tion, (1975) Vol 37, p 869

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 105—Property Rights, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors105.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 105, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano105.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.