Logo-oregonlaws
Sign in
  • Legal Glossary
  • 2011 ORS
  • My Laws
Home > 2011 ORS > Vol. 14 > Chapter 646 > Antitrust Law
 

  • 646.705
    Defini­tions for ORS 136.617 and 646.705 to 646.805
  • 646.715
    Declara­tion of purpose
  • 646.725
    Prohibited acts
  • 646.730
    Monopolies prohibited
  • 646.735
    Exemp­tion for coordinated care organiza­tions
  • 646.736
    Public policy
  • 646.737
    Exemp­tion for negotia­tions governing sale price of Oregon blackberries
  • 646.738
    Exemp­tion for negotia­tions governing price for sale of grass seed
  • 646.739
    Exemp­tion for negotia­tions governing season starting price for sale of Oregon seafood
  • 646.740
    Permitted activities
  • 646.745
    Joint opera­tion of Memorial Coliseum and Arena in Portland
  • 646.750
    Investigative demand by Attorney General
  • 646.760
    Civil penalties
  • 646.770
    Equitable remedies
  • 646.775
    Ac­tions by Attorney General
  • 646.780
    Recovery of treble damages
  • 646.790
    Venue
  • 646.800
    Time of commencing ac­tion
  • 646.805
    Effect of prior final judg­ment or decree
  • 646.815
    Criminal pros­e­cu­­tions
  • 646.821
    Taking testimony for investigative demand
  • 646.823
    Attendance of Attorney General at grand jury pro­ceed­­ing
  • 646.826
    Counsel for per­sons testify­ing
  • 646.831
    Fees and mileage for per­sons testify­ing
  • 646.836
    Confidential status of investigative ma­te­ri­al
  •  

   2011 ORS § 646.823¹
Attendance of Attorney General at grand jury proceedings

Notwithstanding ORS 132.090 (Presence of persons at sittings or deliberations of jury) (1) the Attorney General may attend grand jury proceedings, advise it in relation to its duties, subpoena and examine witnesses and prepare such indictments or presentments as it requires in investigations of violations of ORS 646.725 (Prohibited acts) or 646.730 (Monopolies prohibited). [1977 c.729 §7]

• • •
 
  • Annotations
  • Related
 
Chapter 646

Notes of Decisions

Subject matter regulated by this chapter is not preempted by Federal Robinson-Patman Act so as to render this chapter invalid. W. J. Seufert v. Nat. Restaurant Supply Co., 266 Or 92, 511 P2d 363 (1973)

Whether an injunc­tion should issue when a court finds a viola­tion of the Act is a matter of discre­tion. State ex rel Johnson v. Interna­tional Harvester Co., 25 Or App 9, 548 P2d 176 (1976)

This chapter imposes no af­firm­a­tive duty to inform customers of rates in absence of request, but prohibits making in­for­ma­­tion about prices available to some customers and not others. Wildish Sand & Gravel v. Northwest Natural Gas Co., 103 Or App 215, 796 P2d 1237 (1990), Sup Ct review denied

Breaking North Korea news app for the iPhone

Research Trail

Sign in to view

Instant access — no reg­is­tra­tion re­quired.



1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 646—Trade Practices and Antitrust Regulation, http://­www.­leg.­state.­or.­us/­ors/­646.­html External_link_icon(2011) (last ac­cessed Mar. 25, 2012).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2011, Chapter 646, http://­www.­leg.­state.­or.­us/­ors/­annos/­646ano.­htm External_link_icon(2011) (last ac­cessed Mar. 25, 2012).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.
 
Currency Information
Feedback  ·  Press  ·  Our Sponsors  ·  Blog  ·  About

by WebLaws.org

www.oregonlaws.org