Logo-oregonlaws
Sign in
  • Legal Glossary
  • 2011 ORS
  • My Laws
Home > 2011 ORS > Vol. 6 > Chapter 223 > Economic Improvement Districts
 
  • 223.112
    Defini­tions for ORS 223.112 to 223.132
  • 223.114
    Economic improve­ment
  • 223.117
    Require­ments of assess­ment ordinance
  • 223.118
    Remonstrance against assess­ment
  • 223.119
    Advisory committee
  • 223.122
    Effect of urban renewal districts or local improve­ment districts
  • 223.124
    Extension of assess­ment period
  • 223.127
    Applica­tion of certain assess­ment statutes to economic improve­ment districts
  • 223.129
    Expenditure of assess­ment revenues
  • 223.132
    Forma­tion of economic improve­ment districts as addi­tional power of cities
  • 223.141
    Defini­tions for ORS 223.141 to 223.161
  • 223.144
    Economic improve­ment district
  • 223.147
    Require­ments of business license fee ordinance
  • 223.151
    Advisory committee
  • 223.154
    Extension of business licensing period
  • 223.157
    Expenditure of business license revenues
  • 223.161
    Effect of urban renewal districts or local improve­ment districts
  •  

   2011 ORS § 223.122¹
Effect of urban renewal districts or local improvement districts

The existence of local improvement districts or urban renewal districts in a city does not affect the creation of economic improvement districts under ORS 223.112 (Definitions for ORS 223.112 to 223.132) to 223.132 (Formation of economic improvement districts as additional power of cities). [1985 c.576 §5]

• • •
 
  • Annotations
  • Related
 
§§ 223.112 (Definitions for ORS 223.112 to 223.132) to 223.132 (Formation of economic improvement districts as additional power of cities)

Notes of Decisions

Assess­ment ordinance is legislative decision, not quasi-judicial decision that only may be challenged by writ of review. Kozak v. City of Bend, 231 Or App 163, 217 P3d 1118 (2009)

Chapter 223

Notes of Decisions

Fact that ordinance, which charged fee to prop­erty owners taking advantage of privilege of making connec­tion to city wa­ter system, specified that pay­ment would be secured by liens which would be enforced in matter provided by this chapter did not, of itself, show that such charges were assess­ments. Montgomery Brothers v. City of Corvallis, 34 Or App 785, 580 P2d 190 (1978)

Circuit court has jurisdic­tion to determine merits of assess­ment, but cannot address whether assess­ment is subject to constitu­tional limits on prop­erty taxes. Martin v. City of Tigard, 14 OTR 517 (1999), affd 335 Or 444, 72 P3d 619 (2003)

State statutory pro­ce­dures for financing local improve­ments are not exclusive and do not displace consistent local pro­ce­dures. Baker v. City of Woodburn, 190 Or App 445, 79 P3d 901 (2003), Sup Ct review denied

Breaking North Korea news app for the iPhone

Research Trail

Sign in to view

Instant access — no reg­is­tra­tion re­quired.

1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 223—Local Improvements and Works Generally, http://­www.­leg.­state.­or.­us/­ors/­223.­html External_link_icon(2011) (last ac­cessed Mar. 25, 2012).
 
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2011, Chapter 223, http://­www.­leg.­state.­or.­us/­ors/­annos/­223ano.­htm External_link_icon(2011) (last ac­cessed Mar. 25, 2012).
 
3 OregonLaws.org assembles these lists by analyzing references between Sections. Each listed item refers back to the current Section in its own text. The result reveals relationships in the code that may not have otherwise been apparent.
 
Currency Information
Feedback  ·  Press  ·  Our Sponsors  ·  Blog  ·  About
by WebLaws.org
www.oregonlaws.org