ORS 20.075
Factors to be considered by court in awarding attorney fees

  • limitation on appellate review of attorney fee award

(1)

A court shall consider the following factors in determining whether to award attorney fees in any case in which an award of attorney fees is authorized by statute and in which the court has discretion to decide whether to award attorney fees:

(a)

The conduct of the parties in the transactions or occurrences that gave rise to the litigation, including any conduct of a party that was reckless, willful, malicious, in bad faith or illegal.

(b)

The objective reasonableness of the claims and defenses asserted by the parties.

(c)

The extent to which an award of an attorney fee in the case would deter others from asserting good faith claims or defenses in similar cases.

(d)

The extent to which an award of an attorney fee in the case would deter others from asserting meritless claims and defenses.

(e)

The objective reasonableness of the parties and the diligence of the parties and their attorneys during the proceedings.

(f)

The objective reasonableness of the parties and the diligence of the parties in pursuing settlement of the dispute.

(g)

The amount that the court has awarded as a prevailing party fee under ORS 20.190 (Prevailing party fees).

(h)

Such other factors as the court may consider appropriate under the circumstances of the case.

(2)

A court shall consider the factors specified in subsection (1) of this section in determining the amount of an award of attorney fees in any case in which an award of attorney fees is authorized or required by statute. In addition, the court shall consider the following factors in determining the amount of an award of attorney fees in those cases:

(a)

The time and labor required in the proceeding, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved in the proceeding and the skill needed to properly perform the legal services.

(b)

The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment by the attorney would preclude the attorney from taking other cases.

(c)

The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services.

(d)

The amount involved in the controversy and the results obtained.

(e)

The time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances of the case.

(f)

The nature and length of the attorney’s professional relationship with the client.

(g)

The experience, reputation and ability of the attorney performing the services.

(h)

Whether the fee of the attorney is fixed or contingent.

(i)

Whether the attorney performed the services on a pro bono basis or the award of attorney fees otherwise promotes access to justice.

(3)

In any appeal from the award or denial of an attorney fee subject to this section, the court reviewing the award may not modify the decision of the court in making or denying an award, or the decision of the court as to the amount of the award, except upon a finding of an abuse of discretion.

(4)

Nothing in this section authorizes the award of an attorney fee in excess of a reasonable attorney fee. [1995 c.618 §6; 2001 c.417 §3; 2021 c.325 §1]

Source: Section 20.075 — Factors to be considered by court in awarding attorney fees; limitation on appellate review of attorney fee award, https://www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/bills_laws/ors/ors020.­html.

Notes of Decisions

Factor consideration requirement applies to appellate courts. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc., 327 Or 84, 957 P2d 1200 (1998), clarified 327 Or 185, 957 P2d 1200 (1998)

Findings regarding attorney fees are adequate if sufficiently clear to permit meaningful appellate review of relevant facts and legal criteria relied upon. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc., 327 Or 185, 957 P2d 1200 (1998)

In assessing whether parties and attorneys were reasonable and diligent in pursuing settlement of dispute, court may evaluate offer of settlement unless offer was made during mediation process. Bidwell and Bidwell, 173 Or App 288, 21 P3d 161 (2001)

Lack of findings does not permit reversal on appeal of attorney fees award where opposing party fails to tender specific objections to trial court identifying issues to be considered regarding award. Gillies and Gillies, 175 Or App 460, 28 P3d 1244 (2001)

In determining whether requested hourly rate for attorney fees is reasonable, federal district court for Oregon uses Oregon State Bar Economic Survey as initial benchmark. Roberts v. Interstate Distributor Co., 242 F. Supp. 2d 850 (D. Or. 2002)

In determining objective reasonableness of claims and defenses asserted by party, court may consider only conduct during proceeding, not conduct giving rise to proceeding. Niman and Niman, 206 Or App 400, 136 P3d 1186 (2006)

Trial court’s reduction of requested attorney fees that are otherwise reasonable must be supported by rational nexus between factor that serves as basis of reduction, underlying circumstances that give rise to reduction and amount of reduction. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Co., 233 Or App 210, 225 P3d 101 (2010)

20.075
Factors to be considered by court in awarding attorney fees
20.077
Determination of prevailing party
20.080
Attorney fees for certain small tort claims
20.082
Attorney fees for small contract claims
20.083
Award of attorney fees under void contract, under unenforceable contract or to person who is not party to contract
20.085
Costs and attorney fees in inverse condemnation proceedings
20.094
Attorney fees in actions or suits in which discharge in bankruptcy asserted
20.096
Reciprocity of attorney fees and costs in proceedings to enforce contract
20.097
Attorney fees and costs where defendant prevails in certain proceedings to enforce contract
20.098
Attorney fees and compensation of expert witnesses in certain proceedings for breach of warranty
20.105
Attorney fees where party disobeys court order or asserts claim, defense or ground for appeal without objectively reasonable basis
20.107
Attorney and expert witness fees and other costs on claim of unlawful discrimination
20.115
Service expenses recoverable as costs and disbursements
20.120
Costs on review of decision of officer, tribunal, or court of inferior jurisdiction
20.125
Assessment of costs and attorney fees against attorney causing mistrial
20.130
Proceeding to which state or public corporation is party
20.140
State and certain public corporations not required to advance costs
20.150
Recovery of costs and disbursements when party represented by another
20.180
Effect of tender as to costs
20.190
Prevailing party fees
20.220
Appeal on attorney fees and costs
20.310
Costs and disbursements in Supreme Court or Court of Appeals
20.320
Statement of costs and disbursements
20.330
Costs and disbursements in cases of original jurisdiction
20.340
Contingent fee agreement
Green check means up to date. Up to date