Notes of Decisions
Jury instruction on consequences of guilty except for insanity verdict does not deny defendants right to impartial jury. State v. Amini, 331 Or 384, 15 P3d 541 (2000)
Instructing jury on consequences of guilty except for insanity verdict does not deprive defendant of federal constitutional right to fair trial. State v. Amini, 175 Or App 370, 28 P3d 1204 (2001), Sup Ct review denied
Requirement that court instruct jury in accordance with ORS 161.327 (Commitment or conditional release of person found guilty except for insanity of felony) does not require that instruction include full explanation of all parts of ORS 161.327 (Commitment or conditional release of person found guilty except for insanity of felony). State v. George, 337 Or 329, 97 P3d 656 (2004)
Law Review Citations
51 OLR 428 (1972); 52 OLR 285-295 (1973)
Chapter 161
Notes of Decisions
A juvenile court adjudication of whether or not a child committed acts which would be a criminal violation if committed by an adult must necessarily include an adjudication of all affirmative defenses that would be available to an adult being tried for the same criminal violation. State ex rel Juvenile Dept. v. L. J., 26 Or App 461, 552 P2d 1322 (1976)
Law Review Citations
2 EL 237 (1971); 51 OLR 427-637 (1972)
